<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>NBER Working Paper</title><link>https://www.nber.org/papers</link><atom:link href="http://rss.144-124-237-35.sslip.io/nber/new" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><description>National Bureau of Economic Research Working Papers articles - Powered by AtomRSS</description><generator>AtomRSS</generator><webMaster>contact@atomgroup.dev (AtomRSS)</webMaster><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 03:42:42 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>5</ttl><item><title>Time Travel on Professional Profiles</title><description>&lt;p&gt;
Economists increasingly use professional profile data to reconstruct employment histories and measure skill supply. We show that these records are not fixed historical snapshots, but mutable accounts that workers revise over time. Using monthly vintages of Revelio Labs data from 2020–2026, we document that 19.7 percent of established U.S. LinkedIn users retroactively edit the title or description of a job they have already left. These “time-travel” edits are closely tied to labor market transitions: around such edits, workers are much more likely to change employers as compared to later-editing users. This mutability can bias historical measures of skills, but it also reveals workers’ beliefs about which skills are in demand. Retroactive edits show sharp post-2022 increases in AI-related language and recent reductions in work-from-home and DEI language. Finally, LLM-associated writing markers surge after ChatGPT, especially among less-educated groups and MBAs from lower-ranked programs, revealing heterogeneous AI-assisted profile editing.
&lt;/p&gt;

          &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w35546/w35546.pdf&quot;&gt;Download PDF&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>https://www.nber.org/papers/w35546</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.nber.org/papers/w35546</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><author>Nicholas Bloom, Gideon Moore, Lisa K. Simon, Caelan Wilkie-Rogers</author></item><item><title>Designing Around Selection: Identification and Inference Under Multi-Dimensional Unobserved Heterogeneity</title><description>&lt;p&gt;
We study identification and optimal policy design in a broad class of principal-agent models. We show that the most common empirical framework within the literature is equivalent to an unstructured potential-outcomes model augmented with three specific assumptions: the Law of Demand (LoD), or treatment-effect monotonicity; extrapolative model structure (EMS), which rules out lumpy agent responses to price changes; and rank invariance (RI), which restricts unobserved heterogeneity (UH) to be one-dimensional. This decomposition isolates the identifying content of each assumption and clarifies its economic role. The LoD and MS are empirically testable using exogenous price variation; RI, on the other hand, is a strong assumption ruling out many economically plausible behaviors, and also not empirically testable. We derive sharp bounds on counterfactual outcomes when RI is relaxed. The conventional 1-dimensional model delivers an upper bound on planner objectives, while the lower bound, which allows for arbitrary multi-dimensional UH, has an adversarial interpretation for policy design. We estimate empirical bounds and apply them to nonlinear pricing of rideshare services. The resulting robust pricing policy fully insures against worst-case latent selection while preserving most of the profit and consumer-surplus gains predicted by the conventional model. Our framework provides a tractable approach to robust policy design in adverse-selection settings including Mirrleesian taxation, regulation, labor supply, and procurement.
&lt;/p&gt;

          &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w35547/w35547.pdf&quot;&gt;Download PDF&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>https://www.nber.org/papers/w35547</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.nber.org/papers/w35547</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><author>Brent R. Hickman, John A. List, Ian Muir, Gregory K. Sun</author></item><item><title>Reserves and the Buyer of Last Resort</title><description>&lt;p&gt;
We examine the role of central bank reserves and public liquidity when secondary markets may freeze. Central bank reserves help intermediaries purchase assets during stress but crowd out investment. Under laissez-faire, intermediaries hold insufficient reserves, overlooking how aggregate liquidity reduces freeze risk. We propose a &quot;market-backstop principle&quot;, akin to Bagehot’s principle for intermediaries. It combines state-contingent buyer-of-last-resort interventions to restore trading with modest liquidity requirements to limit moral hazard. The welfare benefits of restoring market functioning exceed the fiscal costs of interventions. We explore implications for the size and composition of central bank balance sheets.
&lt;/p&gt;

          &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w35548/w35548.pdf&quot;&gt;Download PDF&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>https://www.nber.org/papers/w35548</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.nber.org/papers/w35548</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><author>Frederic Boissay, Harald Uhlig</author></item><item><title>Tying Incentives to Information: Diagnosis-Contingent Contracts and Biased Beliefs in Healthcare</title><description>&lt;p&gt;
Unnecessary treatment reflects a gap between what patients believe about their health and their true condition; people often seek and consume care for diseases they suspect, but do not know that actually have. The value a patient places on testing therefore depends on their priors about being sick, and when those beliefs are biased, the resulting testing rate might be sub-optimal and leave welfare on the table. We study diagnosis-contingent incentive contracts, which tie treatment incentives to diagnostic results. For malaria, the contract subsidizes rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) and antimalarials (ACTs) only for patients who test positive. In a cluster-randomized experiment across 140 Kenyan pharmacies, both patient subsidies and provider incentives roughly tripled testing and sharply reduced unnecessary ACT purchases among test-negative patients, working through distinct channels: patient subsidies through lower prices, provider incentives through information and advice. A model of patient choice implies these contracts raise social welfare well above their cost. Estimating the model structurally, we find that because patients substantially overestimate their infection risk, loading incentives onto diagnosis-contingent treatment discounts delivers four times the welfare gains of free testing programs.
&lt;/p&gt;

          &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w35543/w35543.pdf&quot;&gt;Download PDF&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>https://www.nber.org/papers/w35543</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.nber.org/papers/w35543</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><author>Maria Dieci, Paul Gertler, Jonathan T. Kolstad, Carlos Paramo</author></item><item><title>Predictive Risk Scores in the Public Sector: Experimental Evidence from Child-Protection Investigations</title><description>&lt;p&gt;
Many public-sector decisions require allocating scarce attention under uncertainty. We examine whether algorithmic risk assessments improve child-protection decisions, where supervisors decide which cases need closer scrutiny. In a randomized evaluation of 4,752 child referrals over 14 months in Northampton County, supervisors received an algorithmic risk score alongside standard case records. Access to the score increased foster-care placements and services for children at highest predicted risk, with little change for lower-risk cases, and it reduced subsequent maltreatment referrals. We find no evidence that the score widened racial disparities in decisions or outcomes, suggesting algorithms can improve targeting while preserving human discretion.
&lt;/p&gt;

          &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w35540/w35540.pdf&quot;&gt;Download PDF&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>https://www.nber.org/papers/w35540</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.nber.org/papers/w35540</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><author>E. Jason Baron, Arkadev Ghosh, Richard Lombardo</author></item><item><title>Cognitive Limitations and Long-Term Care Use in the Netherlands: Evidence from the Lifelines Cohort Study</title><description>&lt;p&gt;
We analyze the association between cognitive impairments and long-term care use in the 65+ population in the Netherlands. For this, we use data from the Lifelines Cohort Study that are linked to administrative records available through Statistics Netherlands. We find that, among those with cognitive impairments, long-term care use is concentrated in a subgroup: 42% of those with cognitive impairments do not use any long-term care. At the same time, individuals with cognitive impairments who use long-term care have high expenditures, in particular when living in nursing homes. Further analyses reveal that many individuals with cognitive impairments report functional limitations and that cognitive impairment is associated with long-term care use above and beyond these impairments. These findings highlight the importance of taking cognitive impairments into account when seeking to explain the determinants of long-term care use in research and when tailoring long-term care programs to the needs of the elderly when considering policy reforms.
&lt;/p&gt;

          &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w35538/w35538.pdf&quot;&gt;Download PDF&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>https://www.nber.org/papers/w35538</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.nber.org/papers/w35538</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><author>Gaia Bagnasco, Pieter Bakx, Stijn Coremans, Bram Wouterse</author></item><item><title>The China Backlash: Quantifying the Narrative Discourse on China</title><description>&lt;p&gt;
Using text-as-data methods, we quantify the U.S. discourse on China, place it in historical perspective, and compare its evolution across different sources of public narrative. Our analysis is based on a large corpus of materials drawn from public records (presidential and congressional records, newspaper articles, social media, think tank reports). We develop two measures of narrative discourse: an indicator of the frequency with which China is covered and a proxy for how positively or negatively China is presented. We document a sustained decline in net sentiment towards China in presidential sources since the early 2000s, predating Donald Trump’s first term in office. In contrast to presidential documents, congressional, news media, social media, and think tank sources exhibit persistent negative sentiment towards China even in decades prior to the 2000s. Instead of a deterioration in sentiment across the board, what we find is a convergence in presidential sentiment to other sources of narrative discourse. We find no evidence that presidential leadership has played a significant role in setting the narrative tone for the nation as a whole. Historical and shorter-term evidence both point to a bottom-up process of diffusion of narratives, rather than top-down diffusion.
&lt;/p&gt;

          &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w35539/w35539.pdf&quot;&gt;Download PDF&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>https://www.nber.org/papers/w35539</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.nber.org/papers/w35539</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><author>Mert Geyiktepe, Dani Rodrik</author></item><item><title>Financial Interdependence and Currency Internationalization</title><description>&lt;p&gt;
Does financial opening necessarily lead to currency internationalization? To study the competition between incumbent and rising powers under financial interdependence, we develop a model of asset demand with microfounded network effects. Search frictions with currency-specialized intermediaries generate distinct notions of liquidity at asset-market and currency-area levels, which jointly shape the trajectory of currency competition. In the U.S.-China context, China at early stages of financial development benefits from pooling its assets with the dollar area, which reinforces the status quo. As China&#39;s financial markets deepen, RMB issuance allows China to internalize network effects and erode the dollar&#39;s dominance, triggering a discrete shift toward fragmentation. This transition is further shaped by sanctions, financial repression, and third-country responses, highlighting how financial interdependence transforms cooperation into rivalry in the evolution of the international financial order.
&lt;/p&gt;

          &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w35541/w35541.pdf&quot;&gt;Download PDF&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>https://www.nber.org/papers/w35541</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.nber.org/papers/w35541</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><author>Zhengyang Jiang</author></item><item><title>Winners and Losers: Competition, Creative Destruction, and Labor Income Risk</title><description>&lt;p&gt;
Using U.S. administrative data, we find that technology-driven creative destruction in the product market passes through to worker earnings. The passthrough to incumbent worker earnings is both asymmetric and concentrated: profit drops from rival innovations lead to proportionally greater earnings declines and changes in the likelihood of job destruction than profit gains from their own firm’s innovations, while top workers are significantly more exposed than the average worker. We develop an endogenous-growth model with monopsonistic labor markets and worker heterogeneity that replicates this asymmetry and the distribution of earnings risk. In the model, creative destruction exposes high-income workers to concentrated downside risk while increasing upward mobility for lower-income workers, shaping the welfare consequences of innovation policy.
&lt;/p&gt;

          &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w35542/w35542.pdf&quot;&gt;Download PDF&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>https://www.nber.org/papers/w35542</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.nber.org/papers/w35542</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><author>Brice C. Green, Leonid Kogan, Dimitris Papanikolaou, Lawrence D.W. Schmidt</author></item><item><title>Two Selection Problems, One Bias Term: Experimental Sign-Up Is Treatment Choice in Disguise</title><description>&lt;p&gt;
Consider a referee report containing the sentence: “Assignment to treatment was voluntary, though the authors acknowledge this as a limitation in the conclusion.” The Editor would summarily reject. Now replace “assignment to treatment” with “entry into the experimental sample,” and the sentence describes the modal published experiment. This study shows that both biases are the same mathematical object. The bias from non-random sample entry is the sorting-on-gains term from the classic selection decomposition. Interestingly, they both admit an isomorphic Roy micro-foundation and inverse-Mills characterization. A simple calibration reveals that for the typical experiment, the observed bias can be large. One solution to this bias is to conduct a natural field experiment (NFE). When an NFE is not possible, three alternative reporting practices are offered.
&lt;/p&gt;

          &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w35544/w35544.pdf&quot;&gt;Download PDF&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>https://www.nber.org/papers/w35544</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.nber.org/papers/w35544</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><author>John A. List</author></item><item><title>Improving Financial Literacy: From Corporate Finance to Personal Finance</title><description>&lt;p&gt;
This article provides an overview of the literature on financial literacy. It covers the initial measurement that created the Big Three questions and measures of personal finance knowledge featuring 28 questions. It shows that levels of financial literacy are low and have not been improving over time. This is true not only in the United States but also in countries worldwide. These findings matter because financial literacy is conducive to savvy financial behaviors, from holding precautionary savings to planning for retirement to many other financial decisions. Financial education programs have grown exponentially over time, providing important insights into their cost-effectiveness. Personal finance courses have been added to high school and college curricula, and the evidence indicates that they are useful initiatives to improve financial knowledge and downstream behavior.
&lt;/p&gt;

          &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w35564/w35564.pdf&quot;&gt;Download PDF&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>https://www.nber.org/papers/w35564</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.nber.org/papers/w35564</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><author>Annamaria Lusardi</author></item><item><title>Ambiguous Attribution: Theory and Evidence</title><description>&lt;p&gt;
Clarity of responsibility is an essential element of political accountability. We develop a rational model of Bayesian updating in the presence of ambiguous attribution and we test its predictions using an original survey. We show that respondents’ partisanship, assessment of public healthcare quality, and beliefs over which layer of government is responsible for healthcare are correlated as predicted: good-assessment voters attribute responsibility to the layer governed by their preferred party, while bad-assessment voters blame the layer governed by the party they dislike. These partisan patterns of credit and blame, often interpreted as evidence of motivated reasoning or partisan bias, can thus arise from rational Bayesian updating under attribution ambiguity. No such partisan patterns exist where the same party is in charge of regional and central government. A survey experiment in which we inform subjects of the official quality of healthcare has them update in the predicted, partisan, direction. Model and empirical results show that partisan priors are extremely hard to dislodge when attribution is ambiguous.
&lt;/p&gt;

          &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w35550/w35550.pdf&quot;&gt;Download PDF&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>https://www.nber.org/papers/w35550</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.nber.org/papers/w35550</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><author>Ricardo Alonso, Monica Martinez-Bravo, Gerard Padró I Miquel, Carlos Sanz, Silvia Vannutelli</author></item><item><title>The Equilibrium Impact of Credit Frictions: Evidence from Default Risk Using Firm-Level Data</title><description>&lt;p&gt;
This paper examines the impact of credit frictions arising from firm-level default risk on aggregate economic performance. We build a micro-to-macro model with heterogeneous firms and sector-specific production functions, showing that perceived default risk is a sufficient statistic for credit frictions. Using UK administrative data (2004–2019) matched to S&amp;amp;P risk measures, counterfactual estimates reveal that relaxing frictions raises output by 25% and wages by 23%. Ignoring equilibrium wage adjustments overstates output gains, while fixed-capital misallocation approaches understate them. Most gains reflect aggregate capital accumulation. Credit frictions remain above pre-crisis levels, reshape firm size dynamics, increase misallocation across firms, and dampen productivity growth over time.
&lt;/p&gt;

          &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w35552/w35552.pdf&quot;&gt;Download PDF&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>https://www.nber.org/papers/w35552</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.nber.org/papers/w35552</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><author>Timothy J. Besley, Peter John Lambert, Isabelle A. Michalski-Roland, John Van Reenen</author></item><item><title>Sharing the Burden: The Impacts of Pharmacy Sector Reforms on the Labor Market for Pharmacists in Portugal</title><description>&lt;p&gt;
In the depths of the 2010 financial crisis the Portuguese government enacted a series of reforms in its prescription drug reimbursement system. Over the next three years value added per pharmacist in retail pharmacies fell by a third, reflecting a rise in generic substitution and reductions in the markups allowed for prescription drugs. This massive shock led to pay cuts for incumbent pharmacists and the introduction of a two-tier pay system for new hires, with little or no reduction in the growth of employment.  We use detailed longitudinal records from the Quadros de Pessoal data base, merged with information on collective bargaining settlements and firm financial records, to study the impacts of the reforms. We estimate that between 2009 and 2022 average wages of pharmacists fell by a third; most of this reduction was due to lower wages for newly entering cohorts. The implied responsiveness of wages to productivity is substantially above most estimates in the rent-sharing literature, arguably reflecting the strong attachment of workers to the sector and the steady inflow of newly graduating pharmacists.  Stepping back, we then consider how wages of pharmacists have diverged relative to wages of other health care professionals in Portugal, and the decisions of recent college applicants to enter the profession.
&lt;/p&gt;

          &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w35553/w35553.pdf&quot;&gt;Download PDF&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>https://www.nber.org/papers/w35553</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.nber.org/papers/w35553</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><author>David Card, Ana Rute Cardoso, Pedro Luis Silva</author></item><item><title>A Theory of Firm Wage Dynamics</title><description>&lt;p&gt;
We develop a theory of firm wage dynamics that integrates the canonical wage-posting model à la Burdett and Mortensen (1998) with firm dynamics. Firms offer dynamic wage contracts under an equal-treatment constraint in the presence of search frictions. We provide an analytical characterization of equilibrium wage contracts and firm growth as functions only of the distribution of marginal surplus. Consistent with recent empirical evidence, the model implies that (i) firm wages are strongly linked to firm growth but not to firm size; (ii) firm wages decline over the firm life cycle; and (iii) the pass-through of permanent productivity shocks to wages is higher in the short run than in the long run. Firms at the top of the job ladder face excessive labor market competition, so the optimal policy subsidizes their hiring. At the macro level, the optimal policy elevates business dynamism in the steady state, and even more so along the transition.
&lt;/p&gt;

          &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w35554/w35554.pdf&quot;&gt;Download PDF&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>https://www.nber.org/papers/w35554</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.nber.org/papers/w35554</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><author>Marc de la Barrera, Masao Fukui</author></item><item><title>The United States and Its Creditors: Assessing Foreign Demand for U.S. Assets</title><description>&lt;p&gt;
This paper analyzes foreign demand for U.S. assets, with particular emphasis on U.S. Treasury securities. It documents compositional shifts in U.S. bilateral external positions across geographic regions and asset classes, providing estimates of creditor positions closer to a nationality-based concept. While rising U.S. equity prices explain a sizable share of the deterioration in the net external position, foreign purchases of U.S. Treasury securities have been the largest source of U.S. current account financing. The share of these securities held by foreign official investors has declined sharply during the past decade, while the share held by foreign private investors (especially through financial centers) has risen. The decline in foreign official holdings is well explained by lower reserve accumulation, increased Federal Reserve holdings, and dollar appreciation against other reserve currencies. The evidence is consistent with central banks rebalancing their portfolios to avoid large swings in currency shares. Geoeconomic fragmentation is negatively correlated with official demand for U.S. Treasuries, while foreign private demand remains sensitive to safe-haven dynamics. Overall, the paper assesses how these structural shifts affect portfolio preferences for U.S. assets and their potential implications for the U.S. external position amid heightened geopolitical and fiscal uncertainty.
&lt;/p&gt;

          &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w35555/w35555.pdf&quot;&gt;Download PDF&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>https://www.nber.org/papers/w35555</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.nber.org/papers/w35555</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><author>Anusha Chari, Gian Maria Milesi Ferretti</author></item><item><title>Meritocracy and the Networks It Forged: China’s Imperial Examination</title><description>&lt;p&gt;
Institutions that claim to reward merit often also serve as engines that drive the formation of important social networks. We examine this dual role in China’s Imperial Examination, one of history’s longest-lived meritocratic systems. We draw on exam performance data for 24,269 individuals across 112 national examinations in the Qing dynasty (1644–1905) and trace who among them rose to become top officials. Strong exam performance increased the likelihood of attaining high office, but advancement also depended on individuals’ ties to powerful examiners. Because performance and ties to powerful examiners were strongly complementary, individuals’ success appeared to rest on merit even as social networks played a role. Following the major political transformations of the 1840s, the importance of examiner ties persisted, although the influential examiners themselves changed. These findings help explain why such systems retain legitimacy even when networks matter greatly.
&lt;/p&gt;

          &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w35556/w35556.pdf&quot;&gt;Download PDF&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>https://www.nber.org/papers/w35556</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.nber.org/papers/w35556</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><author>Ying Bai, Ruixue Jia</author></item><item><title>Demand for Safety in the Crypto Ecosystem</title><description>&lt;p&gt;
We study the demand for safety and liquidity in the crypto ecosystem. We do so under a framework in which a representative investor allocates liquidity across stablecoin deposits in lending pools and traditional safe assets (e.g., MMF shares). Our model delivers three main predictions: (i) the stablecoin deposit premium co-moves with the Treasury premium when investors value the safety and liquidity services of stablecoins; (ii) increases in Treasury supply reduce the stablecoin deposit premium; and (iii) drops in the perceived safety and liquidity of stablecoin deposits (e.g., due to de-pegs or hacker attacks) reduce their premium. Using granular data from hundreds of DeFi pools spanning multiple protocols, tokens, and blockchains, we find evidence supporting these predictions. Investors treat stablecoin deposits as money-like instruments that are borderless and permissionless, yet as fragile as other forms of privately produced safe assets.
&lt;/p&gt;

          &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w35557/w35557.pdf&quot;&gt;Download PDF&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>https://www.nber.org/papers/w35557</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.nber.org/papers/w35557</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><author>Murillo Campello, Angela Gallo, Lira Mota, Tammaro Terracciano</author></item><item><title>Unpacking Treatment Effect Heterogeneity in a Large-Scale Dropout-Prevention Experiment</title><description>&lt;p&gt;
Timely high school completion is a critical step in successful transitions to post-secondary schooling and the labor market. This randomized controlled trial, deployed in two urban, disadvantaged school districts, tests the effectiveness of a mature and comprehensive student-support program on an unusually large scale (n=2,528). While overall effects on graduation rates are small and statistically insignificant, exploratory analyses reveal notable variation by site and over time, mirroring heterogeneity in treatment timing and program implementation. These findings highlight the challenges of scaling interventions and raise concerns about generalizing results from small-scale, single-site evaluations.
&lt;/p&gt;

          &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w35558/w35558.pdf&quot;&gt;Download PDF&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>https://www.nber.org/papers/w35558</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.nber.org/papers/w35558</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><author>Thomas Dee, Chloe R. Gibbs, Rebecca Margolit-Chan, Lillian Morrell, James X. Sullivan</author></item><item><title>Replaceable but Employed: Automation and the Meaning of Work</title><description>&lt;p&gt;
Can automation harm workers without replacing them? We study jobs in which workers value both producing useful output and knowing that the output depends on their own contribution. A credible machine alternative can weaken that second source of meaning even when the firm retains the worker. Our model shows that this loss raises compensation when wages adjust fully; when they adjust only partly, workers bear some of the loss themselves. It can also make automation more likely. An external developer may profit by publicly demonstrating a machine before licensing it, because the demonstration lowers the value of the human alternative. This &quot;meaning externality&quot; can create demand for the machine and make profitable development socially harmful. Better technical quality and greater public salience have different effects: quality improves output, while salience alone weakens human work. Automation can, therefore, reduce the value of work before it eliminates jobs.
&lt;/p&gt;

          &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w35559/w35559.pdf&quot;&gt;Download PDF&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>https://www.nber.org/papers/w35559</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.nber.org/papers/w35559</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><author>Joshua S. Gans</author></item><item><title>Detecting Critical Junctures as They Unfold: Foundations, Measurement, and Applications from 120 Years of Reporting</title><description>&lt;p&gt;
Explaining why some countries grow rich while others remain poor requires knowing how — and when — institutions change. A large body of research argues that institutional change often occurs at critical junctures: moments when multiple institutional futures are possible, including a return to the status quo. Yet most empirical work examines critical junctures only in retrospect, risking the omission of pivotal moments when institutions were in flux but ultimately remained unchanged. We develop a new empirical approach to detect critical junctures as they unfold. Our key insight is to understand critical junctures as moments of uncertainty about institutions, which provides a text classifier with a theoretically motivated object to detect in contemporaneous discourse. In this chapter, we apply this idea to the study of historical critical junctures using newspaper text as a rich source of information regarding contemporary beliefs about institutional uncertainty. We translate this insight into a measurement strategy by training a large language model-based classifier, which we apply to the Times of London archive — 11.95 million articles spanning 1800 to 2019 — while focusing our main empirical analysis on 120 years of reporting from 1900 to 2019. This produces the first long-run, text-based measure of institutional uncertainty grounded in the concept of critical junctures. Compared to established indices of geopolitical and economic risk, our measure innovates on several fronts: (i) it captures high uncertainty even in periods without formal institutional change, consistent with ex-ante definitions of critical junctures; (ii) it provides earlier signals of major global convulsions, such as World War I; (iii) it evaluates candidate critical junctures using a common ex ante measure; and (iv) it opens new avenues for studying how critical junctures shape institutions and long-run development. Today, our Times-based index suggests that institutional uncertainty in the US and UK is as elevated as it was in the early 1940s — a signal missed by other leading measures of risk.
&lt;/p&gt;

          &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w35545/w35545.pdf&quot;&gt;Download PDF&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>https://www.nber.org/papers/w35545</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.nber.org/papers/w35545</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><author>Michael Callen, Gregory Levy, Saipremnath Muthukumaran, Jonathan L. Weigel, Noam Yuchtman</author></item><item><title>Long-Run Effects of H-1B Immigration on the U.S. Economy</title><description>&lt;p&gt;
We study the effects of H-1B immigration on U.S. industries that employ H-1B workers and their trading partners. Using a novel cross-industry design and the 1999–2003 expansion of the H-1B visa cap for identification, we find that H-1B exposure raised incomes for natives and pre-existing immigrants, with gains concentrated in non-STEM occupations. Income gains propagate forward through supply chains to downstream industries but not backward to upstream industries, consistent with a productivity shock rather than a labor supply shock. We find no direct effect on patenting, suggesting that productivity gains arise from better task execution rather than patentable invention.
&lt;/p&gt;

          &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w35560/w35560.pdf&quot;&gt;Download PDF&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>https://www.nber.org/papers/w35560</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.nber.org/papers/w35560</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><author>Ran Abramitzky, Leah Platt Boustan, Ahmet Gulek, Jens Hainmueller</author></item><item><title>The Anatomy of Tariff Pass-through into Consumer Prices</title><description>&lt;p&gt;
Tariffs raise the prices of goods made at home, not just the imports they tax—an effect that standard pass-through estimates largely miss. Studying the 2025 U.S. tariffs, we find that about 26 percent of the tariff increase passes through to consumer prices. These estimates are measured relative to less-exposed goods and hold aggregate conditions fixed. The direct effect accounts for 64 percent of this increase, as tariffs raise the consumer prices of foreign varieties of a good. The remaining 36 percent arises indirectly—tariffs raise the cost of imported inputs used by U.S. producers, and domestic producers raise their markups because they face less competition from higher-priced imports. The direct effect passes through quickly, since tariffs raise import prices almost immediately, but the indirect effect takes nine to twelve months to work its way through supply chains. As a result, tariffs have a larger and more drawn-out impact on consumers than the direct effect alone would suggest.
&lt;/p&gt;

          &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w35561/w35561.pdf&quot;&gt;Download PDF&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>https://www.nber.org/papers/w35561</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.nber.org/papers/w35561</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><author>Mary Amiti, Sebastian Heise, David Weinstein</author></item><item><title>Chinese Sputnik Moments?</title><description>&lt;p&gt;
China’s technological progress in recent decades has been viewed with admiration, alarm, and (in some cases) doubt. To better understand the Chinese innovation ecosystem, we compile a dataset of almost 14 million domestic Chinese patent publications. We focus on the subset of critical technologies identified by the U.S. Department of Defense. Several surprising patterns emerge from the data: Chinese patenting is strongly associated with other measures of innovative progress; patents are not concentrated in corporate giants such as Huawei; universities have played a key role in innovation, much greater than state-owned enterprises or government-owned facilities; and fewer than one in ten Chinese critical technology patents involves an inventor with U.S. experience or training. Finally, using four text-based measures of patent quality, we show that the rise of Chinese patenting in critical technologies has not been associated with a decline in quality relative to the U.S. awards.
&lt;/p&gt;

          &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w35551/w35551.pdf&quot;&gt;Download PDF&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>https://www.nber.org/papers/w35551</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.nber.org/papers/w35551</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><author>Josh Lerner, Namrata Narain, Dimitris Papanikolaou, Amit Seru, Zunda Winston Xu</author></item><item><title>Monetary Policy in Mandarin Capitalism</title><description>&lt;p&gt;
This paper investigates why China’s recurrent credit expansions have coincided with persistently weak inflation. We argue that this pattern reflects the country’s production-oriented monetary regime. At the aggregate level, faster monetary-financial expansion temporarily raises PPI inflation but depresses it over longer horizons. At the sectoral level, liability growth among listed industrial firms is followed by weaker producer prices, lower profitability, higher leverage, rising inventories, and reduced capacity utilization. We also find asymmetric supply-chain transmission: downstream liability growth raises upstream PPI inflation, while upstream liability growth does not generate a corresponding downstream price response. These findings indicate that credit expansion in China tends to sustain production and balance sheets rather than stimulate final demand. As a result, monetary policy operates less as a conventional tool for demand management and durable reflation, and more as a mechanism for preserving production capacity and supporting growth.
&lt;/p&gt;

          &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w35562/w35562.pdf&quot;&gt;Download PDF&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>https://www.nber.org/papers/w35562</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.nber.org/papers/w35562</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><author>Jeffery (Jinfan) Chang, Wei Xiong</author></item><item><title>Incomplete Information and Self-Fulfilling Inflation Dynamics—Lucas meets Keynes</title><description>&lt;p&gt;
This paper incorporates the Lucas (1973) island model into a standard DSGE framework. It demonstrates that self-fulfilling stochastic inflation equilibria, which are driven by intrinsic uncertainty or pure sentiments, can exist under rational expectations. Furthermore, it shows that these sentiment-driven stochastic equilibria exhibit monetary non-neutrality, even when the fundamental equilibrium is unique and monetarily neutral. As the aggregate price or inflation rate can appear to fluctuate independently of the money supply, our model explains the complex relationship between inflation and the money supply in the real world, where the basic quantity theory of money often seems invalid.
&lt;/p&gt;

          &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w35563/w35563.pdf&quot;&gt;Download PDF&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>https://www.nber.org/papers/w35563</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.nber.org/papers/w35563</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><author>Jess Benhabib, Pengfei Wang, Yi Wen</author></item><item><title>Selecting Innovation Funding Mechanisms: A Framework for Policymakers</title><description>&lt;p&gt;
The U.S. federal government spends roughly $150 billion a year on research and development through mechanisms ranging from grants and contracts to prizes, advance market commitments, and tax credits. These funding mechanisms differ markedly in risk allocation, decision authority, and incentive power, yet policymakers have little systematic guidance for choosing among them. We develop a framework that asks the policymaker three initial questions about the contracting environment: Can they articulate the work to be done? Can they specify what would constitute a successful solution? Can they identify the most capable performers to contract with? The answers considerably narrow the set of viable mechanisms, enabling a more tractable choice of the efficient mechanism based on further considerations from the innovation-economics literature.
&lt;/p&gt;

          &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w35549/w35549.pdf&quot;&gt;Download PDF&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>https://www.nber.org/papers/w35549</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.nber.org/papers/w35549</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><author>Matthew S. Clancy, Matthew Esche, Siddhartha Haria, Claire T. McMahon, Christopher M. Snyder, Caleb Watney</author></item><item><title>Common Ownership and Collusion</title><description>&lt;p&gt;
We provide the first empirical evidence that common ownership can facilitate explicit collusion. Our unique setting, the population of legal cartels in Sweden, lets us observe cartel formation, duration, and dissolution without the sample-selection bias that plagues studies of detected cartels. Combining hand-collected ownership data with the universe of registered cartels, we compute firm-pair profit weights (κ) that measure how much one firm internalizes a rival&#39;s profits. Higher profit weights are associated with a greater likelihood of cartel participation, predict future cartel involvement, and are linked to longer cartel duration. Firms also reduce their profit weights immediately after a cartel dissolves. However, this relationship is concentrated among pairs in which the firm that internalizes the rival firm&#39;s profits colludes while the rival does not. Common ownership therefore complements a firm’s own participation in explicit collusion but substitutes for cartel participation by the rival whose profits it internalizes.
&lt;/p&gt;

          &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w35565/w35565.pdf&quot;&gt;Download PDF&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>https://www.nber.org/papers/w35565</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.nber.org/papers/w35565</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><author>Vincent Abraham, Florian Ederer, Catarina Marvao</author></item><item><title>The Economics of Civil Service Protections</title><description>&lt;p&gt;
The study of bureaucracy as a key dimension of state capacity has gained increasing attention in economics. What organizational features create an effective bureaucracy, however, remains subject to debate. This paper focuses on the central role of civil service protections in delineating the boundary between politics and administration. I introduce a simple principal-agent framework to discuss the key theoretical channels through which political insulation can shape bureaucrat performance. Guided by the framework, I establish stylized facts and organize evidence from historical and contemporary civil service reforms. Overall, the micro-level evidence documents a positive effect of civil service protections on the quality of public service delivery. I conclude with open questions about the political economy of reform adoption.
&lt;/p&gt;

          &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w35568/w35568.pdf&quot;&gt;Download PDF&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>https://www.nber.org/papers/w35568</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.nber.org/papers/w35568</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><author>Guo Xu</author></item><item><title>Childhood Cognitive and Behavioral Impairments and Adult Health</title><description>&lt;p&gt;
We use U.S. nationally representative longitudinal data to estimate the effects of cognitive and behavioral impairments in childhood on health in adulthood. We focus on work-limiting health conditions and fair or poor self-rated health but also consider adequacy of sleep, body weight, and health behaviors (use of various substances and preventive health care) as potential pathways. In household fixed effects models, we find that both impairments are strongly associated with having a work-limiting health condition in adulthood; specifically, cognitive impairments increase the probability of a work-limiting condition by 70% and behavioral impairments increase the probability by 60%. Individuals with cognitive impairments in childhood are 43% more likely to report being in fair or poor health in adulthood compared to individuals without cognitive impairments. The effects of cognitive impairments on health do not appear to operate through insufficient sleep, obesity, or health behaviors. Individuals with childhood behavioral impairments are no more likely to report being in fair or poor health but are more likely to get insufficient sleep and to be obese, compared to individuals without behavioral impairments, suggesting that insufficient sleep and obesity could potentially lie on the pathway from behavioral impairments in childhood to work-limiting health conditions in adulthood.
&lt;/p&gt;

          &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w35566/w35566.pdf&quot;&gt;Download PDF&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>https://www.nber.org/papers/w35566</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.nber.org/papers/w35566</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><author>Hope Corman, Kelly Noonan, Nancy Reichman</author></item><item><title>The Value of Behavioral Policies</title><description>&lt;p&gt;
Behavioral interventions have become central to modern public policy, but their empirical promise remains contested because estimated treatment effects often appear small. We argue that a policy response is economically meaningful only relative to the response generated by alternative policies. We assemble more than 1,200 estimates from over 600 studies comparing “nudges” and traditional price interventions in the markets for cigarettes, alcohol, influenza vaccination, electricity, and residential water. Translating nudge effects into equivalent price changes, we find that behavioral interventions often correspond to enormous fiscal interventions, from an 11% tax on electricity to a 100% subsidy on influenza vaccinations. Nudges are also more cost-effective than price instruments in all markets, but cost-effectiveness does not predict the welfare ranking of policies. Using a behavioral extension of the Marginal Value of Public Funds, we show that nudges have high welfare returns at the margin, while price instruments often generate larger total surplus at scale.
&lt;/p&gt;

          &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w35567/w35567.pdf&quot;&gt;Download PDF&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>https://www.nber.org/papers/w35567</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.nber.org/papers/w35567</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><author>John A. List, Matthias Rodemeier, Sutanuka Roy, Gregory K. Sun</author></item></channel></rss>